It is difficult to get a [person] to understand something when [their] salary depends on [them] not understanding it.
~ Upton Sinclair
Am I being selfish by choosing not to comply with the experimental treatment public health leaders are mandating?
Studies show that natural immunity promotes more sustainable health. Yet, here in Canada, paternalistic leaders refuse to accept naturally acquired immunity.
The literature on the microbiome (the collection of microbes living in/on our bodies) shows that maintaining a diverse array of good bugs will keep the bad bugs in check. Excessive use of antibiotics and antivirals can cause superbugs.
Research in India affirms that the loss of diversity in our inner and outer ecology (due to excessive hygiene and sterilization) interferes with training our innate immunity. Sampling the natural environment is essential to adapt to the local terrain. India has had tremendous success in reducing case counts partially because immune systems are primed to become more vigilant by a diverse array of bacteria and other microbes.
Creating a memory through exposure to the whole virus of concern, rather than just one protein, makes sense for the least vulnerable. The fatality numbers per age group are very telling about who is at risk. Protect the vulnerable. Leave the healthy alone.
Injecting the code that turns human cells into spike-protein-making factories may be a recipe for disaster. The spike protein is harmful to the whole body.
Natural immunity is preferable under the current circumstances. Look no further than to who is being afflicted by the latest variant.
Nutrition, lifestyle and hygiene therapy are within my scope of practice
I make informed decisions when it comes to health.
My priority is not preventing personal harm. I am willing to sacrifice for the greater good. Saving lives and livelihoods over the long term is why I choose not to comply. It’s not all about me. I care about our collective safety and well-being.
Since March 2020, I have been willing to put travel on hold. I have chosen to cook for myself and my loved ones. I have made do without live entertainment. I have not hesitated to stay home until we can restore sanity and overcome fear.
When those creating the mandates are unwilling to debate highly-credentialed experts who have an opposing view or release the data used in policy-making, I become suspicious.
When I hear the medical officers of health deny injection side effects published in their own government websites and offer unsubstantiated assurance of safety to prevent hesitancy, I experience righteous anger. We, the taxpayers, pay their salaries and may be harmed.
The doctors who risk losing their jobs by treating patients early and sharing early treatment protocols are the heroes of today. They are on the right side of history. They are doing the grand rounds. They are teaching others what they have learned.
It is egregious that public health is now promoting injections and dependence on pharmacy for health on Sesame Street when children are the least vulnerable and have the potential to increase natural herd immunity with minimal consequence, in the case of this virus.
As a coach, I recognize behaviour modification attempts when I see them. Mass psychosis and the social engineering objective - a needle in every arm, annually for life - are crystal clear. It's not about health.
Closing thoughts
I have claimed in the past that I am not anti-anything. I am pro-health. Having studied how to change public opinion and groupthink, I know that moving towards a solution is better than moving away from a problem. What we focus on expands. Respectful communication will save the day.
I will never attend an anti-war rally; if you have a peace rally, invite me.
~ Mother Teresa
When my understanding leads me to conclude that I have a greater likelihood of becoming a burden to the health care system by consenting to unnecessary injections, it is reasonable to abstain. It is far from selfish. It is selfless.
I know how to prevent disease. And if I do become sick, I am conscientious and will not expose others. I am savvy enough to heal myself when I can and seek the help of health care practitioners who think outside the box when needed.
So when public health officials ask what they can do to reduce my hesitancy, the answer is simple,
Convince me when the science is on your side, else leave me alone.
I am not putting anyone at risk. Right now, in my informed opinion, public health mandates are.
コメント